- #2017 mac mini on sale full
- #2017 mac mini on sale pro
- #2017 mac mini on sale software
- #2017 mac mini on sale series
(Image: Architosh / All rights reserved.)
#2017 mac mini on sale pro
Winner: iMac Pro 2017 narrowly defeats M1 Mac mini. Some of our testing we are holding off on until we can verify some details and others until we can obtain some Apple native versions of real-world apps.Ĭinebench R23, Multi-Core CPU Test.
#2017 mac mini on sale full
This article in Xpresso will not cover the full extent of our testing. The M1 - CPU PerformanceĪll this testing is quite extensive. We also tested against some circa 2017 HP Xeon and i7 workstations-all of which give us a pretty good idea of how a USD 700.00 machine stacks up against workstations costing many thousands of dollars. We did not have the latest iMac Pro to test against, so we are testing against the first generation iMac Pro (2017). Both of these apps were tested under Rosetta, giving the M1 a disadvantage. This last app utilizes the Parasolid modeling kernel, the most popular geometry modeling kernel in the world. To test some real-world apps, we have some standard testing models for SketchUp (a frequency-bound, single-core-oriented app) and some Vectorworks Architect test files (see Part 2). One final note, we also did the browser application Speedometer 2.0 benchmark. There are other benchmarks Architosh has utilized in the past (like Blender Benchmark, Novabench, Unigine Heaven, XBench, et al.), but we are limited with those that are M1-native. For GPU, I tested extensively on the GFXBench and Basemark test suites. For CPU, these included the well-regarded Geekbench 5 and Cinebench test suites.
All in the Nameįor industry benchmark testing suites, I only used those that are M1-capable (no Rosetta usage). I wanted to focus on two aspects to see if the M1 could meet the minimum hardware requirements for Enscape (if that program ever comes to Mac) and meet the minimum specifications for standard VR headsets.
The next most important thing to focus on is the M1’s GPU performance because today’s BIM solutions are more dovetailed with leading photo-realistic and interactive rendering programs.
#2017 mac mini on sale series
However, its single-core performance-thanks to Apple’s Firestorm cores-is quite astounding, besting AMD’s Ryzen 5000 series top-flight chip on Geekbench 5 scores. The M1 delivers very respectable multi-core performance, as we will see below. This is not to disregard multi-core processing. It should help out in basic operations such as transformations, tessellation, projection of geometry entities in Vectorworks, as well as inside the Parasolid modeling kernel. For example, when speaking of Rhino, they say, “because modeling is its primary function, Rhino is a frequency-bound application, a key factor to consider when determining your Rhino 3D hardware requirements.”įP performance is important to both 2D and 3D Vectorworks. That is why the workstation folks over at BOXX aim architecture and engineering customers to high-frequency hardware solutions. To back that “yes” up, I want to note that single-core performance is of the highest importance in the CAD world, particularly in AEC. But could a sub-1000 dollar machine really be a serviceable CAD/3D machine for professionals? After many benchmarks and real-world app tests (under Rosetta 2.0 no less), the short answer is “yes!” Introduction: Tests and Machines
#2017 mac mini on sale software
And I had heard stunning praise from CAD industry software developers. I already knew Apple Silicon was a possible game-changer. Now, less than a year later, Apple has come out with a chip (M1) that delivers a stunning performance of its own, and at least by one benchmark is the new reigning single-core performance champion.īut just how powerful is the M1 as compared to rival hardware options out there? And how well might this chip perform in CAD and 3D application environments? These were the questions I sought to answer ever since Architosh obtained a new (late 2020) Mac mini with an M1 processor. IT WASN’T THAT LONG AGO THAT AMD stole Intel’s single-core performance crown with its Zen 3 chip architecture in the new Ryzen 5000 series CPUs.
0 kommentar(er)
